As is usual this posting is a matter of rumour,allegations,anecdotes, observations, historical memory/fact and written evidence.
So we come to the "night of the long knives" this is the evening where despite doing all he could do to prevent it George Shaw had to show his hand.
All of Barkings shortlisting meetings were taking place at the Abbey community centre, and despite being told that they were not allowed to be present, we are told that on the evening there were quite a large number of the potential candidates hanging around. We are also told that there were quite a few of them inside the hall itself. Seems to us its one law for some and one law for them.
We are told that Rob Chapman and Dominic Twomey were checking off people on a list as they arrived.
Thames Ward members were the usual faces but there were we are told at least 2 who members did not recognise at all.
2 female long standing members of the party turned up at the door to take part, 1 of them was told by Chapman and Twomey that she could not go in as her membership had lapsed.
We understand, but are still trying to clarify the point, that the word 'lapsed' is only used if your membership has not been renewed for 3 months.
This lady had brought along copies of evidence that her membership had run out the previous Saturday and she had renewed it by post on the Monday, she then put up the argument that she had renewed her membership and paid her dues, but, neither Chapman or Twomey would accept it.
This is despite the letter going out to all members informing them that if they had not paid their membership they could still attend the meeting as long as they had paid their fees by 6.0pm on the day of the shortlisting meeting. Which of course this lady could prove she had.
We hear from a number of sources that a very heated exchange took place but Chapman and Twomey were adamant she was not getting in. Of course they had counted the numbers already in there and knew exactly how many George needed to win.
George opened the meeting and we understand that members were asked to agree 6 candidates to be interviewed none of which was Fred Barns, a member moved from the floor that the ward should interview 7 and that rightly Fred should be interviewed.
In stepped someone very very close to George who moved that a vote be taken that the ward only interviewed 6 and that she could not and would not support the inclusion of Fred.
We understand that George had great difficulty in controlling his facial expressions at this time at could not keep the look of pure smugness off his face.
A ballot of members took place and George announced that it was a tied ballot. George then stated he would as Chairman use his casting vote.........a moment of pure triumph for evil here, it should really be accompanied by a drum roll.....George completed his final act of treachery by voting against the inclusion of Fred to the shortlist.
We understand that silent uproar broke out, members just got up from their seats and walked out in disgust.
Outside very very angry ward members were pretty vocal on their feelings about George and his corrupt actions. We understand a lot of decisions were made outside of that meeting that could have a major impact on labour in Thames and Barking.
Of course Barry Poulton could not resist turning up to gloat at this time.
But, what the ward members did not realize at that time is that George Shaw under Party Rules did NOT have the right as Chairman to use the casting vote.
Members have discovered that now and have made their protests but of course they are being ignored by the North Street mafia.
In our next post we will describe the total farce of the ward interviews??????and let you know just how many party members from Thames have resigned from the party over this.
As is usual this posting is a matter of rumour, allegations, anecdotes, observations historical memory/fact and written evidence.
I was the person who moved that all 7 candidates should go through, but was ignored. If I had known that George did not have the right to the casting vote I would have spoken up earlier. The whole thing was a fix and I came out of the meeting disgusted and very very angry.
ReplyDeleteThere should not have been any candidates outside, and the lady who protested about her subscription should have been allowed to be in the hall.
The whole precedure was a farce. There were two people at the meeting that I have never ever seen before at a Thames Ward meeting. Where did these people come from? I have never seen them since. Who were they and what were they doing there?
Why can't the selection be re-taken with people who are paid up members and not George Shaw's family and cronies? It's about time the whole thing was investigated and declared corrupt.
Good on you Mickey, first hand experience of just what did happen on the night.
ReplyDeleteAlthough this blog seems to get their facts right time and time again it is always good to get another individual on here telling their story and also putting their name to it.
Congratulations for standing up for and by the people you trust and believe in.
Thames ward resident
In response to Mickey Lincolns question we would like to point out that we have received numerous emails asking WHY the short listing procedure for Thames Ward which many believe was corrupted and not in line with party rules cannot be run again.
ReplyDeleteIn fact many of our postings and friends and readers comments have asked the same question.
We believe that the deathly silence both from the North Street mafia and London Region answers the question.
they KNOW it was a clear breach of the rules.
But, their arrogance in their belief of total power leads them to believe that they can safely kick all comments and questions into the long grass, stupidly believing that Barking members and residents will get over it, forget about and, and in time come to embrace the new candidates they have put up.
Once upon a time under the old Labour Party that may well have worked, we are pretty sure that older readers of our blog will remember when hatchet jobs were done on certain sitting councillors.
But NEVER with the amount of personal venom, and deep seated almost criminal level of corruption that is coming out of North Street now.
If members were to read the Labour Party rules they would find in there numerous mentions of the fact that the party recognises the fact that it has to be mindful when dealing with individual party members of the Human Rights Legislation. And also the equalities Act.
It is pretty clear to us and should also now be coming clear to all those of our readers that the North Street mafia have NOT read the Labour Party rule book. Even the so called representative of London Region Rob Chapman, who by the way is a councillor in Hackney with a terrible record of attendance at council meetings, and who believes that he can make up and intreprete the rules to suit himself is in deep trouble.
As we hear on the grapevine that a number of those de-selected Councillors with the full support and external financial backing are in consultation with a senior Human Rights Lawyer.
The Labour Party has changed, nationally it is disarray, over the last few years it has moved away from its roots, many now within the party nationally and even within the corridors of power are now publically stating that they only way to save the party is to return to those roots.
We would strongly recommend to our readers that they read the past 2 speeches made by Jon Cruddas MP who we understand many in Barking would wish was their MP, in his speeches he clearly outlines how he and many others believe is the only way to rebuild a shattered party, and in doing so beat the BNP.
It is clear to us, after maintaining this blog for just a few months that the Right wing racist views and stance by Margaret Hodge and her very small number within the North Street mafia are not the views of the majority of over 400 Barking party members. Nor are they the views of a large number of the residents in the wards where the mafia has corruptly de-selected trusted ward councillors.
Just wondered if Mickey Lincoln had thought of writing a letter of complaint to the General Secretary of the Labour Party about what happened at this meeting.
ReplyDeletePretty sure he could get easy access to party rules which would help him in writing his letter because as it says in the main posting there was a clear breach of party rules.
night shift worker
I am seriously considering doing just that 'night shift worker' I am a member of the Labour Party but have not been in long enough to know the rules. They have only just been made clear to me.
ReplyDeleteGood for you Mickey, and while you are at it you might like to give the General Secretary the address to the blog, that way he can read just what people in the borough think of whats going on.
ReplyDeletenight shift worker