We have been reliably informed that residents who are phoning councillor Aziz (he is the only one in the ward who has put a land line telephone number) with problems are being told they will be called back and to leave a message.
Sure enough they are called back, when school is out by councillor Aziz son who we are told is telling residents that he is the Secretary for the ward Councillors for Gascoigne, he will be the one who will take all the details of their problems down, he will then investigate and come back to them in 7/10 days.
It is no small wonder then that the majority of residents are refusing to give their personal information to an outsider, and we are told that an awful lot of residents are not happy at all.
Saturday 19 June 2010
NAUGHTY NAUGHTY
North street really do believe in rubbing the noses of the voters right in it don't they.
Have you seen the latest leaflet they are putting out for the by election in Goresbrook ward? by the way North street you really should train your delivery boys better, they wasted an awful lot of your money putting 100s of leaflets out in River ward.
Anyway, the headline Back Lollipop Louise, and there she is in her council uniform holding the tools of her trade (not gone down too well with the Electoral Commission that one we hear). 71 years old, makes what M Hodge was saying on the doorstep out to be a lie, when she was telling voters she was putting in new, younger and more dynamic councillors.
Lollipop! more like an empty sherbet lemon that one, and North street have proved it themselves by saying that she did not realise the rules on standing as a councillor. Well if she and the agent could not read and understand the easy to read fact sheet sent to all candidates and Agents how on earth is she going to read and understand complex council reports?
And as for the deliberate lie that the rules had been changed come on give it a break those rules have been in place for some 20 years. Louise was devastated that she made a mistake, nope devastated she got caught. Still we are pretty sure she will explain all that to the judge.
We will post more on the alleged claims of success by Letchford and Clee later.
Oh just one other minor point, how can an employee of the MP who is paid by the tax payer act as the Agent in this by election, why haven't the Local Government committee followed their own party rules and met to select the Local Government committee election Agent?
Have you seen the latest leaflet they are putting out for the by election in Goresbrook ward? by the way North street you really should train your delivery boys better, they wasted an awful lot of your money putting 100s of leaflets out in River ward.
Anyway, the headline Back Lollipop Louise, and there she is in her council uniform holding the tools of her trade (not gone down too well with the Electoral Commission that one we hear). 71 years old, makes what M Hodge was saying on the doorstep out to be a lie, when she was telling voters she was putting in new, younger and more dynamic councillors.
Lollipop! more like an empty sherbet lemon that one, and North street have proved it themselves by saying that she did not realise the rules on standing as a councillor. Well if she and the agent could not read and understand the easy to read fact sheet sent to all candidates and Agents how on earth is she going to read and understand complex council reports?
And as for the deliberate lie that the rules had been changed come on give it a break those rules have been in place for some 20 years. Louise was devastated that she made a mistake, nope devastated she got caught. Still we are pretty sure she will explain all that to the judge.
We will post more on the alleged claims of success by Letchford and Clee later.
Oh just one other minor point, how can an employee of the MP who is paid by the tax payer act as the Agent in this by election, why haven't the Local Government committee followed their own party rules and met to select the Local Government committee election Agent?
Thursday 10 June 2010
JOHN BROWN ENVELOPE DAVIS AT IT AGAIN
We have been reliably informed that John (brown envelope) Davis has not wasted any time in getting up to his old tricks.
We have been told that John (brown envelope) Davis is sunning himself with his partner in Cyprus thanks to a restaurant owner in the borough who Davis managed to persuade him to give up his home for a week or two so that they could enjoy a free holiday.
We do wonder if this gift will be entered in the Councils Gifts and hospitality register?
We have been told that John (brown envelope) Davis is sunning himself with his partner in Cyprus thanks to a restaurant owner in the borough who Davis managed to persuade him to give up his home for a week or two so that they could enjoy a free holiday.
We do wonder if this gift will be entered in the Councils Gifts and hospitality register?
WHY CANT THE NORTH STREET MAFIA BE HONEST WITH ITS OWN PARTY MEMBERS?
Dropping through Barking Labour party members doors this morning is a letter from Laila Butt we are told.
We would draw your attention to a sentence that is really making some members angry, in fact they are asking the question "do that lot think we are all stupid?"
Have a look at the sentence that's causing so much anger:
"Through a bureaucratic error which the BNP have ruthlessly exploited, one of our elected councillors, Louise Couling, has to fight again her election to the council."
When all know there was no bureaucratic error, there was Electoral Malpractice on behalf of Barking Labour Party, which we have been told is under investigation by New Scotland Yard, but please don't call this an error, there was no last minute change of the rules, all candidates were given the rules in black and white, there are persons to be held to account but don't pass the blame on it sits where it should with North Street.
And as for asking for donations, we don't think anyone will be opening their wallets to pay for your mistakes.
We would draw your attention to a sentence that is really making some members angry, in fact they are asking the question "do that lot think we are all stupid?"
Have a look at the sentence that's causing so much anger:
"Through a bureaucratic error which the BNP have ruthlessly exploited, one of our elected councillors, Louise Couling, has to fight again her election to the council."
When all know there was no bureaucratic error, there was Electoral Malpractice on behalf of Barking Labour Party, which we have been told is under investigation by New Scotland Yard, but please don't call this an error, there was no last minute change of the rules, all candidates were given the rules in black and white, there are persons to be held to account but don't pass the blame on it sits where it should with North Street.
And as for asking for donations, we don't think anyone will be opening their wallets to pay for your mistakes.
Wednesday 9 June 2010
JUST A QUITE WORD
As we are pretty sure the scum who choose to send through vicious, nasty and threatening comments about several individuals who have nothing whatsoever to do with the running of this blog should have realised that we are not going to publish their foul shit.
But we do ask the question, "is this how you get your rocks off"? are you so repulsive to women that you sit and have your dreams over a keyboard?
Well lets just warn you that your little messages are now being tracked, and if we have anything to do with it you could end up being someones Bitch in Brixton.
Yes we have friends in high places too, and just remember yours is no longer in government.
But we do ask the question, "is this how you get your rocks off"? are you so repulsive to women that you sit and have your dreams over a keyboard?
Well lets just warn you that your little messages are now being tracked, and if we have anything to do with it you could end up being someones Bitch in Brixton.
Yes we have friends in high places too, and just remember yours is no longer in government.
Friday 4 June 2010
HERE IS A PUZZLE FOR YOU
One of the councillors re-elected this time made a number of rather puzzling claims in their bid to be re-selected. So much so that we have spent a large amount of time checking out their claims.
Lets see if you can find an answer to the mystery that unfolds.
The candidate claims to have finished university in the early 1970s, then started their professional career in Barking & Dagenham. Ending up we understand as a head of a department in South London borough. Now even in their cv it appears that this professional career ends in 1980. Certainly all our investigations prove this to be so. Now isn't it rather odd then for an individual to choose to end their professional career at 31 years of age, and to have no other traceable employment from 1980 other than for approx 6 weeks every summer since.
And isn't it even odder that this person did not join the trade union that represented their profession until some 10 years after they ceased to work.
We can find no evidence at all they would support a retirement from this profession through ill health of this individual.
So its a mystery, a puzzle, our investigations have not finished yet, but of course if you recognize who we are referring to and have any info please let us know.
Lets see if you can find an answer to the mystery that unfolds.
The candidate claims to have finished university in the early 1970s, then started their professional career in Barking & Dagenham. Ending up we understand as a head of a department in South London borough. Now even in their cv it appears that this professional career ends in 1980. Certainly all our investigations prove this to be so. Now isn't it rather odd then for an individual to choose to end their professional career at 31 years of age, and to have no other traceable employment from 1980 other than for approx 6 weeks every summer since.
And isn't it even odder that this person did not join the trade union that represented their profession until some 10 years after they ceased to work.
We can find no evidence at all they would support a retirement from this profession through ill health of this individual.
So its a mystery, a puzzle, our investigations have not finished yet, but of course if you recognize who we are referring to and have any info please let us know.
SHAME ON YOU
If the word that has reached us is true, then we can only assume that North Street and Barking CLP have no respect for the community of Barking.
If they did would they be putting up Louise Couling again in the by election in Goresbrook Ward.
Knowing full well that this by election has to be held because she and they broke the law.
Knowing full well that Louise Couling could face criminal proceedings in the Crown Court, because even though she knew only too well that she was disqualified from standing as a candidate in the recent local election because she was employed by the council. A fact that was well known to the Agent Darren Rodwell and to the London Regional organiser they still went ahead.
Now taxpayers money is going to be spent running a by election, when in Barking and Dagenham services are facing cuts and so are staff.
To claim as he has, that she was only a part time employee and a junior member of staff is no argument Rodwell the rules are there to be followed as you will no doubt find out over time, this is only the first of what could be a number of by elections over the coming months, because you and your mafia failed to heed any advice given to you.
And just what are the voters going to think? that all you can come up with is an individual who has already been caught out in a fraud, that you are thumbing your nose at the voters in Goresbrook Ward telling them that is what they deserve.
Well lets wait and see just what happens.
If they did would they be putting up Louise Couling again in the by election in Goresbrook Ward.
Knowing full well that this by election has to be held because she and they broke the law.
Knowing full well that Louise Couling could face criminal proceedings in the Crown Court, because even though she knew only too well that she was disqualified from standing as a candidate in the recent local election because she was employed by the council. A fact that was well known to the Agent Darren Rodwell and to the London Regional organiser they still went ahead.
Now taxpayers money is going to be spent running a by election, when in Barking and Dagenham services are facing cuts and so are staff.
To claim as he has, that she was only a part time employee and a junior member of staff is no argument Rodwell the rules are there to be followed as you will no doubt find out over time, this is only the first of what could be a number of by elections over the coming months, because you and your mafia failed to heed any advice given to you.
And just what are the voters going to think? that all you can come up with is an individual who has already been caught out in a fraud, that you are thumbing your nose at the voters in Goresbrook Ward telling them that is what they deserve.
Well lets wait and see just what happens.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)